Click here to view our current activities in Gastroenterology. |
Selecting Antiviral Therapy for a Treatment-Naive Patient with Hepatitis B
— Posting 3
LEARNING OBJECTIVE: For patients undergoing treatment of chronic HBV infection, implement monitoring and treatment strategies that will prevent or rapidly detect the emergence of drug resistance.
DISCLOSURE: Robert G. Gish, MD
Referred by his primary care physician, a 40-year-old Chinese man presented to his gastroenterologist for further evaluation after detection of elevated liver enzyme levels on routine laboratory evaluation. The patient had a serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level 90 U/L and normal liver synthetic tests. The gastroenterologist evaluated the patient for viral hepatitis and found him to be HBsAg positive. Subsequent testing documented that the patient had a serum HBV DNA level 3 x 108 IU/mL, platelet count 130,000/mm3, and normal alpha-fetoprotein level, and that he was HBeAg positive and anti-HBe negative. On physical examination, the patient's spleen was 13 cm in height.
The gastroenterologist suspected early cirrhosis and decided to start the patient on oral antiviral therapy using lamivudine 100 mg/d, since this medication was the only treatment that was on the patient's formulary list. The physician followed the patient sporadically with laboratory tests over the next few years. At 28 months of treatment, the patient presented with jaundice and serum HBV DNA level 2 x 107 IU/mL. The patient had prolonged International Normalized Ratio (INR) and, on examination, ascites. He subsequently developed rapidly progressive liver disease, despite the addition of adefovir to the lamivudine regimen, and required an urgent liver transplant 2 months later. His hospital course was complicated, with hospital charges for his peritransplant care ultimately amounting to more than US$400,000.
In your opinion, is lamivudine still an appropriate choice for first-line therapy in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection?
a. Yes b. NoDiscussion
As illustrated by this case study, drug resistance is an important concern in patients treated with oral antiviral agents for hepatitis B. Resistance has been associated with the formation of vaccine escape mutants, increased risk of resistance to other antiviral medications for hepatitis B, disease flare, rapid progression of liver disease, need for urgent liver transplantation, and death.1,2 As has been seen clinically, patients with drug-resistant mutations can transmit the infection to other individuals. Therefore, an important objective of disease management in hepatitis B is to prevent and detect development of resistance.
The choice of first-line therapy greatly affects a patient's risk of developing resistance. Some agents, particularly lamivudine, not only have a higher risk of resistance during initial therapy, but also predispose to cross-resistance against other oral antivirals used to treat HBV infection. For this reason, in the latest revision of the US Treatment Algorithm, lamivudine is no longer recommended for use as first-line therapy.3 Agents recommended for primary therapy in treatment-naive patients include peginterferon, entecavir, and adefovir. Peginterferon has not been shown to be associated with resistance, and (based on 2-year data) entecavir resistance appears to occur only in the presence of preexisting lamivudine mutations (9%) and not in treatment-naive patients (0%).4,5 Adefovir has much lower rates of resistance (29% at 5 years in HBeAg negative patients6 and 42% in HBeAg positive patients7) than lamivudine (70% at 4 years overall).8
Select patients are candidates for peginterferon (ie, those who lack psychiatric/medical contraindications or decompensated cirrhosis, particularly if they have intermediate or low baseline HBV DNA [104-8 IU/mL] and high ALT levels [>80 U/mL]9). For such patients, peginterferon may be considered before nucleos(t)ide therapy since it has defined treatment intervals and high HBeAg seroconversion rates. In HBeAg positive patients, response is better in genotype A than in B, and equivalent in B and C, which, in turn, respond better than genotype D.10,11 In HBeAg negative patients, peginterferon is modestly effective (20% virologic response as defined by long-term off-treatment HBV DNA negativity by PCR), with no specific benefit in one genotype over another.12
Oral antivirals—adefovir and entecavir—are alternatives for primary therapy. In a placebo-controlled trial, after nearly 3 years of adefovir, HBeAg positive patients showed good response (56% virologic, 43% HBeAg seroconversion, and 81% normalized ALT).13 In a similar trial, 79% of HBeAg negative patients achieved undetectable HBV DNA, and 88% had a normalized ALT level.14 Entecavir, the newest nucleoside option for treating HBV, has shown consistent superiority over lamivudine in inducing histologic improvement, reducing HBV DNA levels, and normalizing ALT.15-17 Recently reported 2-year data on entecavir show that 93% of treatment-naive patients reached undetectable (<300 copies/mL) HBV DNA levels, with no genotypic or clinical evidence of resistance.5
Regardless of the agent selected for treatment, it is necessary to monitor for resistance. Rising HBV DNA level is the first clinical sign of resistance and has independently been associated with progression of liver disease, cirrhosis, cirrhosis-related complications, and hepatocellular carcinoma.18-21 Moreover, patients who do not reach HBV DNA negativity are at the highest risk of developing drug resistance on therapy, as mutation is dependent on HBV DNA replication.22 Monitoring for HCC is also important and considered standard of care in patients at risk for liver cancer, specifically those patients with cirrhosis and men over the age of 40.
After establishing a baseline level, clinicians should monitor HBV DNA at 3 months after initiation of treatment to document that there is at least a 1-log10 IU/mL reduction in HBV DNA.23 If the patient does not achieve a ≥1-log decrease at each 3-month interval in which HBV DNA should be measured (considered primary treatment failure),23 change to an alternative therapy such as entecavir or adefovir. Continue monitoring at least every 3 to 6 months after a documented response to identify any ≥1-log10 IU/mL increase from nadir following an initial response, which indicates the presence of medication resistance (ie, breakthrough [rebound], or secondary treatment failure)23 and the need to change to an alternative therapy or add a second drug.
The addition of adefovir to lamivudine has been shown to be an effective treatment for lamivudine-resistant patients.24-26 There is some evidence that adefovir resistance is more common in lamivudine-resistant patients than in treatment-naive patients when adefovir monotherapy is used (ie, when lamivudine is discontinued).27 Switching to entecavir has also been found to be an effective option for lamivudine-resistant patients, improving histologic, biochemical, and virologic outcomes.28,29 Lamivudine resistance somewhat increases the risk of entecavir resistance such that viral rebound has been observed in 9% of patients by week 96.5 Note that once a patient has decompensated liver disease, it may be too late to stop progression to liver failure by adding or changing medications. Such patients should be referred immediately for liver transplant.30
Commercial resistance assays are now available through commercial laboratories to monitor for drug resistance by identifying point mutations that are associated with both genotypic and phenotypic resistance. Use of such testing is not mandatory but may be useful to rule out noncompliance in patients with virologic breakthrough during infection. Since mutations are detectable before emergence of clinical resistance, testing may allow for early alterations in treatment to prevent disease flare in patients at particular risk for complications from progression.
In summary, drug resistance is an important clinical concern in patients with HBV infection. HBV DNA monitoring is critical in detecting lack of response and breakthrough during treatment. Strategies to minimize the risk of resistance include selection of a first-line therapy that has a low risk of resistance and cross-resistance and prompt change in treatment regimens for patients who do not respond or who experience virologic rebound.
References
- Lok ASF, Lai C-L, Leung N, et al. Long-term safety of lamivudine treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:1714-1722.
- Dienstag JL, Goldin RD, Heathcote EJ, et al. Histological outcome during long-term lamivudine therapy. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:105-117.
- Keeffe EB, Dieterich DT, Han SB, et al. A treatment algorithm for the management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. In press. August 2006.
- Tenney DJ, Levine SM, Rose RE, et al. Clinical emergence of entecavir-resistant hepatitis B virus requires additional substitutions in virus already resistant to lamivudine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:3498-3507.
- Colonno R, Rose R, Levine S, et al. Entecavir two year resistance update: no resistance observed in nucleoside naïve patients and low-frequency resistance emergence in lamivudine refractory patients [poster 962]. Presented at: 56th Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease; November 11-15, 2005; San Francisco, Calif.
- Borroto-Esoda K, Arterburn S, Snow A, et al. Final analysis of virological outcomes and resistance during 5 years of adefovir dipivoxil monotherapy in HBeAg-negative patients [abstract 483]. J Hepatol. 2006;44(suppl 2):S179-S180.
- Hepsera® (adefovir dipivoxil) Product Information. Foster City, CA: Gilead;2006.
- Lai CL, Dienstag J, Schiff E, et al. Prevalence and clinical correlates of YMDD variants during lamivudine therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:687-696.
- Gish RG. Clinical trial results of new therapies for HBV: implications for treatment guidelines. Semin Liver Dis. 2005;25(suppl 1):29-39.
- Janssen HL, van Zonneveld M, Senturk H, et al. Pegylated interferon alfa-2b alone or in combination with lamivudine for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2005;365:123-129.
- Lau GK, Piratvisuth T, Luo KX, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2a, lamivudine, and the combination for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2682-2695.
- Marcellin P, Bonino F, Lau GK, et al. Factors associated with sustained virologic response 1 year after treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a (40kd) (PEGASYS®) monotherapy for HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B [abstract 976]. Hepatology. 2005;42(suppl 1):580A.
- Marcellin P, Chang TT, Lim S, et al. Long term efficacy and safety of adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) 10 mg in HBeAg+ chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients: increasing serologic, virologic and biochemical response over time. Hepatology. 2004;40:655A.
- Hadziyannis S, Tassopoulos N, Chang TT, et al. Three year study of adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) demonstrates sustained efficacy in presumed precore mutant chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients in long term safety and efficacy study (LTES) [abstract 46]. Presented at: 39th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL); April 14-18, 2004; Berlin, Germany.
- Chang TT, Gish RG, de Man R, et al. A comparison of entecavir and lamivudine for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1001-1010.
- Lai CL, Shouval D, Lok AS, et al. Entecavir versus lamivudine for patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1011-1020.
- Gish RG, Chang TT, De Man RA, et al. Entecavir results in substantial virologic and biochemical improvement and HBeAg seroconversion through 96 weeks of treatment in HBeAg(+) chronic hepatitis B patients (study ETV-022) [abstract 181]. Hepatology. 2005;42(suppl 1):267A.
- Chen C-J, Yang H-I, Su J, et al. Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma across a biological gradient of serum hepatitis B virus DNA level. JAMA. 2006;295:65-73.
- Chen G, Lin W, Shen FM, et al. Viral load as a predictor of liver disease in chronic hepatitis B infection [abstract 996]. Presented at: 55th Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases; October 29-November 2, 2004; Boston, Mass.
- Yuan HJ, Yuen MF, Ka-Ho Wong D, Sablon E, Lai CL. The relationship between HBV-DNA levels and cirrhosis-related complications in Chinese with chronic hepatitis B. J Viral Hepat. 2005;12:373-379.
- Iloeje UH, Yang H-I, Su J, Jen C-L, You S-L, Chen C-J. Predicting cirrhosis risk based on the level of circulating hepatitis B load. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:678-688.
- Locarnini S. Molecular virology and the development of resistant mutants: implications for therapy. Semin Liver Dis. 2005;25(suppl 1):9-19.
- Locarnini S, Hatzakis A, Heathcote J, et al. Management of antiviral resistance in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Antivir Ther. 2004;9:679-693.
- Lampertico P, Viganò M, Manenti E, Del Ninno E, Colombo M. No evidence for adefovir resistance in HBeAg-negative lamivudine resistant patients treated with lamivudine-adefovir combination for 3 years [poster 499]. J Hepatol. 2006;44(suppl):S186.
- Benhamou Y, Thibault V, Vig P, et al. Safety and efficacy of adefovir dipivoxil in patients infected with lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B and HIV-1. J Hepatol. 2006;44:62-67.
- Cortelezzi A, Viganò M, Zilioli VR, et al. Adefovir added to lamivudine for hepatitis B recurrent infection in refractory B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia on prolonged therapy with Campath-1H. J Clin Virol. 2006;35:467-469.
- Lee YS, Suh DJ, Lim YS, et al. Increased risk of adefovir resistance in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B after 48 weeks of adefovir dipivoxil monotherapy. Hepatology. 2006;43:1385-1391.
- Yurdaydin C, Sollano J, Hadziyannis S. Entecavir results in continued virologic and biochemical improvement and HBeAg seroconversion through 96 weeks of treatment in lamivudine-refractory, HBeAg(+) chronic hepatitis B patients (ETV-026) [abstract 80]. Presented at: 41st Annual Meeting of European Association for the Study of the Liver; April 26-30, 2006; Vienna, Austria.
- Yurdaydin C, Senturk H, Boron-Kaczmarska A, et al. Entecavir (ETV) demonstrates consistent responses throughout baseline disease and demographic subgroups for the treatment of lamivudine-refractory HBeAg(+) patients with chronic hepatitis B [abstract 512]. Presented at: 41st Annual Meeting of European Association for the Study of the Liver; April 26-30, 2006; Vienna, Austria.
- Lampertico P, Viganò M, Manenti E, Iavarone M, Lunghi G, Colombo M. Five years of sequential lamivudine to lamivudine+adefovir therapy suppresses HBV replication in most HBeAg-negative patients with no evidence for adefovir resistance in HBeAg-negative lamivudine resistant patients treated with lamivudine-cirrhotics, preventing decompensation but not hepatocellular carcinoma [abstract 85]. J Hepatol. 2006;44(suppl):S38.

